📅 Daily CouncilSaturday, 3 October 2026· money← Previous day
Do you agree with the council's verdict?

Shared council · 3 Oct 2026 · What is Council AI?

88%
Confidence
88%
Council consensus

Should you pay off your mortgage early or invest extra money in the st

analysis · 5-model panel · balanced debate · rigorous chair

The question

Should you pay off your mortgage early or invest extra money in the stock market instead?

⚠ Not professional advice. Treat this as general information only and consult a financial advisor before acting.
⚖ Chairman's verdict

There is no universal right answer, but there is a clear decision rule that resolves almost every case. The core comparison is between a guaranteed, risk-free, tax-free return equal to your after-tax mortgage rate and a risky, uncertain after-tax stock return that has historically averaged about 7 percent real (roughly 10 percent nominal) over long periods. Because the mortgage return is certain and stocks are not, the risk-adjusted breakeven sits below the raw historical stock return. In practice, for a typical 2024-2025 US borrower, the dividing line is roughly 5 to 6 percent after tax. Concrete recommendation by after-tax mortgage rate: - Below about 4 to 5 percent after tax: invest the extra money in a low-cost, diversified index fund such as VTI or VTSAX (expense ratio around 0.03 to 0.04 percent). This is the clear 'invest instead' zone. A 3 percent mortgage is cheap leverage you should keep. - Between about 5 and 6 percent after tax: it is close to a coin flip on expected returns. Split the extra cash, for example 50/50 or 60/40 between tax-advantaged index investing and mortgage principal. This hedges regret in either direction. - Above about 6 to 7 percent after tax: lean toward prepaying the mortgage. A guaranteed 6.5 to 7 percent risk-free return is competitive with a risk-adjusted stock bet, and it is certain. For a typical 2024-2025 borrower with a 6.5 to 7 percent mortgage and no liquidity problem, a reasonable default is to split the extra cash, roughly 60 to 70 percent into tax-advantaged index investing and 30 to 40 percent into mortgage principal, or to prepay if the guaranteed return feels better than a volatile market. Before you choose either path, do these in order: - Capture any full employer 401(k) match. That is an immediate 50 to 100 percent return and beats both options. - Pay off high-interest debt above your mortgage rate, such as credit cards and personal loans. - Build an emergency fund of 3 to 6 months of expenses (some advisors say 6 to 12 months if your income is unstable). - Max tax-advantaged accounts. For 2025 the 401(k) limit is $23,500 with a $7,500 catch-up for age 50+, and the IRA limit is $7,000 with a $1,000 catch-up. These usually beat both extra mortgage payments and taxable investing. Two factors that flip the math and are often missed: - The mortgage interest deduction. After the 2017 tax law raised the standard deduction to $29,200 married filing jointly and $14,600 single for 2024, most households take the standard deduction and get zero tax benefit from mortgage interest. If you do itemize, your effective mortgage rate is roughly rate times (1 minus marginal tax rate), which strengthens the case for investing. Note there is no 25 percent federal bracket under current law; the rates are 10, 12, 22, 24, 32, 35, and 37 percent. - Liquidity. Money put into mortgage principal is locked in home equity and expensive to extract (HELOC, cash-out refinance). Money in a brokerage account stays accessible. If your job or income is unstable, keep liquidity first. A worked example makes the trade-off concrete. A $400,000 30-year fixed mortgage at 6.5 percent costs about $2,528 per month in principal and interest and roughly $510,000 in total interest. Putting an extra $500 per month toward principal pays it off about 9 to 10 years early and saves well over $200,000 in interest. Investing that same $500 per month at a 10 percent nominal return grows to roughly $1.13 million in 30 years. The investment wins only if the market actually delivers near its historical average, which it does not do on any reliable schedule. The S&P 500 lost about 37 percent in 2008 and about 18 percent in 2022, so the invest-the-difference strategy only works if you can stay invested through downturns. If a market drop would make you sell, prepaying the mortgage is the better behavioral choice. One thing I would not do is prepay the mortgage while carrying credit card debt or leaving free 401(k) match on the table. Also note that risk-free cash alternatives such as Treasury bills and high-yield savings accounts have recently yielded around 4.5 to 5.2 percent, which can beat a sub-4 percent mortgage without any stock market risk, though those yields are variable and taxable and should not be treated as a permanent spread.

Key reasoning

The decision is a risk-adjusted comparison, not a raw return comparison. Paying down a mortgage gives a guaranteed, risk-free, tax-free return equal to the after-tax mortgage rate. Investing in a diversified stock portfolio has historically returned about 10 percent nominal and roughly 7 percent real per year over the long run, but with roughly 15 to 18 percent annual volatility and painful multi-year drawdowns. Because the mortgage return is certain and stocks are not, the risk-adjusted breakeven sits below the raw historical stock return, which is why a 6 to 7 percent mortgage is competitive with a risk-adjusted stock bet while a 3 to 4 percent mortgage is a clear invest-instead case. The after-tax mortgage rate is the single most important input, and for most US households after the 2017 tax law the effective rate equals the nominal rate because they take the standard deduction and get no mortgage interest deduction. Liquidity and tax-advantaged account priority come before either choice.

Points of agreement
  • The decision hinges primarily on the mortgage interest rate, tax situation, time horizon, and risk tolerance.
  • Paying down a mortgage provides a guaranteed, risk-free return equal to the mortgage rate, while stock returns are uncertain.
  • Long-run S&P 500 returns have averaged about 10 percent nominal and roughly 7 percent real, but with large drawdowns.
  • Low-rate mortgages (roughly below 4 to 5 percent) favor investing; high-rate mortgages (roughly above 6 to 7 percent) favor prepaying.
  • Liquidity matters: money in home equity is illiquid, while brokerage money is accessible.
  • Capture the full employer 401(k) match, pay off high-interest debt, and build an emergency fund before choosing either path.
  • Maxing tax-advantaged accounts usually beats both extra mortgage payments and taxable investing.
  • A hybrid or split allocation is often the best practical compromise in the middle rate zone.
  • The mortgage interest deduction only helps if you itemize, which most households no longer do after the 2017 tax law.
Disagreements & tradeoffs
  • Answer A claimed paying down a 7 percent mortgage is equivalent to earning a guaranteed pre-tax return of roughly 8.5 to 9.5 percent; reviewers B and D noted the reasoning is flawed because mortgage interest is paid with after-tax dollars, and the correct pre-tax equivalent is roughly rate divided by (1 minus tax rate).
  • Answer C contained major arithmetic and factual errors: it used 4.5 percent as the current 30-year mortgage rate, cited a nonexistent 25 percent federal tax bracket, and claimed $10,000 of extra principal on a 4.5 percent loan saves $2,025 in first-year interest when the correct figure is about $450.
  • Members disagreed on the exact rate thresholds: A used 4 to 5 percent for investing and 6 percent for prepaying, B used 5 percent and 6 to 7 percent, D used 4 to 5 percent and 6 to 7 percent, and E used 4 percent and 6.5 percent. The consensus band is roughly 5 to 6 percent after tax as the middle zone.
  • Members differed on how strongly to recommend a split allocation: D and B endorsed a 50/50 or 60/40 split as often best, while A and E treated splitting as a secondary hedge.
  • Answer E cited risk-free cash yields of 4.5 to 5.2 percent as easily beating low-rate mortgages; reviewer D noted these yields are time-sensitive and taxable and should not be treated as a permanent spread.
🔎 Fact check (live web search)

Specific claims from the answers, checked against current web sources before the Chairman wrote the verdict.

  • ✓ SupportedThe 2025 401(k) contribution limit is $23,500 with a $7,500 catch-up limit for age 50+.

    The sources confirm that the 401(k) contribution limit for 2025 was $23,500 and the catch-up contribution limit for individuals aged 50 and older was $7,500.

  • ✓ SupportedThe 2025 IRA contribution limit is $7,000 with a $1,000 catch-up limit.

    For 2025, the standard IRA contribution limit is $7,000, and the catch-up contribution limit for those age 50 and older is $1,000 (totaling $8,000).

  • ✓ SupportedFor a 2024 tax filing, the standard deduction is $29,200 for married filing jointly and $14,600 for single filers.

    For the 2024 tax year, the standard deduction is $29,200 for married filing jointly and $14,600 for single filers.

  • ✗ DisputedUnder current US federal income tax brackets, there is a 25% tax bracket.

    Under the current federal income tax brackets, the seven tax rates are 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35%, and 37%; there is no 25% tax bracket.

Risk & uncertainty
  • Sensitive domain — general information, not professional advice. Consult a qualified expert before acting.
  • Future stock returns and interest rates are uncertain; historical averages are not a promise, and the S&P 500 lost about 37 percent in 2008 and about 18 percent in 2022.
  • The mortgage interest deduction only applies if you itemize; after the 2017 tax law most households take the standard deduction ($29,200 married filing jointly, $14,600 single for 2024) and get no tax benefit.
  • There is no 25 percent federal tax bracket under current law; the rates are 10, 12, 22, 24, 32, 35, and 37 percent.
  • Risk-free cash yields such as Treasury bills and high-yield savings accounts are variable and taxable, so they should not be treated as a permanent spread over a low-rate mortgage.
  • The 2025 401(k) catch-up limit is $7,500 for age 50+, but the rule is more nuanced for ages 60 to 63.
  • The employer match is an immediate 50 to 100 percent return only if you are vested and meet the plan's match formula.
  • Refinancing to a lower rate could change the analysis entirely and should be considered before prepaying.
  • The worked example uses a 10 percent nominal stock return; using a more conservative 7 percent after-tax return would narrow the investment advantage considerably.
  • Consensus among models is not proof; they can share blind spots.

Suggested next steps

  1. Calculate your after-tax mortgage rate: nominal rate times (1 minus marginal tax rate) if you itemize, or just the nominal rate if you take the standard deduction.
  2. Compare that after-tax rate to a realistic after-tax expected stock return of roughly 6 percent for a diversified index fund.
  3. Confirm you have captured the full employer 401(k) match, paid off any debt above your mortgage rate, and hold 3 to 6 months of expenses in cash.
  4. Check whether you are maxing tax-advantaged accounts: 2025 401(k) limit $23,500 plus $7,500 catch-up if 50+, and IRA limit $7,000 plus $1,000 catch-up.
  5. If your after-tax mortgage rate is below about 4 to 5 percent, direct extra cash to a low-cost total-market index fund such as VTI or VTSAX.
  6. If your after-tax mortgage rate is above about 6 to 7 percent, direct extra cash to mortgage principal or split it roughly 60/40 with index investing.
  7. If you are in the 5 to 6 percent middle zone, choose a split allocation such as 50/50 and revisit annually as rates and your risk tolerance change.
  8. Consider whether refinancing to a lower rate would change the math before committing to a long prepayment plan.
  9. Stress-test your plan against a 30 to 40 percent market drawdown to confirm you would not panic-sell.

Model scorecard

•DeepSeek R1🏆 #1
Accuracy97%
Consensus96%
Answer D · composite 96
•DeepSeek V3#2
Accuracy93%
Consensus91%
Answer B · composite 92
✦Gemini Flash#3
Accuracy87%
Consensus88%
Answer E · composite 84
✦Gemini Flash#4
Accuracy86%
Consensus91%
Answer A · composite 83
◈GPT-OSS 120B#5
Accuracy58%
Consensus73%
Answer C · composite 58
Each model's answer (5)
✦Gemini Flash· Answer A

The decision to pay off a mortgage early versus investing the money in the stock market hinges primarily on your mortgage interest rate, tax bracket, time horizon, and personal risk tolerance. Mathematically, the stock market has historically delivered higher returns. The S&P 500 has an average annualized nominal return of approximately 10% over the long term (around 7% after inflation). If your mortgage interest rate is low—specifically below 4% to 5%, which is common for loans originated or refinanced between 2010 and 2021—you will almost certainly build more wealth by investing extra cash into broad-market index funds, such as the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index (VTSAX) or an S&P 500 fund (VOO). Even after accounting for long-term capital gains taxes, the expected spread between a 3% mortgage and an 8-10% market return is substantial over a 15-to-30-year horizon. However, if your mortgage rate is high—currently in the 6.5% to 7.5% range—the calculation shifts in favor of paying down the mortgage. Paying off debt provides a guaranteed, risk-free return equal to your effective mortgage interest rate. For example, paying down a 7% mortgage is equivalent to earning a guaranteed, pre-tax return of roughly 8.5% to 9.5% in an investment portfolio, depending on your tax bracket, because investment gains are taxed whereas mortgage principal reduction is an untaxed saving. In today's market environment with rates above 6.5%, paying off the mortgage becomes a highly competitive, risk-free alternative to volatile equities. There are also crucial non-mathematical factors: - Liquidity: Money invested in a brokerage account remains liquid and accessible in emergencies, whereas money tied up in home equity is illiquid unless you refinance or take out a Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC), which can be difficult to obtain if you lose your job. - Psychological security: The peace of mind that comes from owning your home free and clear carries immense emotional value for many people, eliminating the risk of foreclosure during economic downturns. Concrete Recommendation: 1. Prioritize guaranteed wins first: Ensure you have an emergency fund of 3 to 6 months of expenses, capture any full employer 401(k) match, and pay off any high-interest debt (above 8%). 2. If your mortgage rate is under 5%: Keep paying the scheduled minimum and invest the extra cash into tax-advantaged accounts (IRA, 401k) or low-cost index funds. 3. If your mortgage rate is 6% or higher: Make extra principal payments to lock in a risk-free return, or consider split allocations (e.g., 50% to principal paydown, 50% to equities) to hedge between guaranteed savings and long-term equity growth.

•DeepSeek V3· Answer B

The decision comes down to comparing a guaranteed, tax-free return (paying down the mortgage) against a higher but uncertain after-tax return (investing in stocks), adjusted for your risk tolerance, liquidity needs, and tax situation. In most cases today, a disciplined investor with a long time horizon and adequate emergency savings will likely come out ahead by investing the extra money in a low-cost, diversified stock index fund rather than prepaying a low-rate fixed mortgage. But if your mortgage rate is high (roughly 6-7%+ as of 2024-2025), or you are risk-averse, or you value the psychological and cash-flow benefit of being debt-free, prepaying is the better and safer choice. Here is the concrete math. Paying down a mortgage gives you a return equal to your mortgage interest rate, risk-free and tax-free (assuming you do not itemize deductions; if you do, the effective return is lower, roughly rate x (1 - marginal tax rate)). Investing in a broad stock index fund has historically returned about 7% per year after inflation (about 10% nominal) over long periods, based on the S&P 500's long-run average, but with large year-to-year swings and no guarantee over any given decade. So compare: - If your mortgage rate is 3% (common for loans taken in 2020-2021), the guaranteed 3% from prepaying is well below the expected ~7% real return from stocks. Investing wins on expected value, assuming you can tolerate volatility and will not panic-sell. - If your mortgage rate is 7% (common for loans taken in 2023-2024), the guaranteed 7% tax-free return is close to or above the expected after-tax stock return, and it is risk-free. Prepaying becomes very attractive, especially for conservative investors. - A middle case, say 5%, is roughly a coin flip on expected returns, so risk tolerance and liquidity decide. Two factors often overlooked: 1. Liquidity. Money put into a mortgage is illiquid; you cannot easily get it back except by selling or refinancing. Money in a taxable brokerage account is accessible. Keep 3-6 months of expenses in cash before doing either. 2. Tax-advantaged accounts. If you are not already maxing out a 401(k) (2025 limit: $23,500, plus $7,500 catch-up if 50+) or an IRA ($7,000, plus $1,000 catch-up), the tax deduction and tax-free growth usually make contributing there the highest-priority move, ahead of both extra mortgage payments and taxable investing. Employer match is an immediate 50-100% return. A balanced, concrete recommendation: - First, capture any employer 401(k) match and build an emergency fund. - Second, if your mortgage rate is above roughly 6-7%, prioritize extra principal payments after maxing tax-advantaged accounts, because the risk-free return is competitive. - Third, if your mortgage rate is below roughly 5% and you have a 10+ year horizon, invest the extra in a low-cost total-market index fund (e.g., VTI or VTSAX, expense ratio 0.03-0.04%) in a tax-advantaged or taxable account. - A hybrid is often best: split the extra money, e.g., 50/50, which captures some guaranteed return and some market upside while reducing regret in either scenario. One caveat: past stock returns are not a promise. The S&P 500 lost about 37% in 2008 and about 18% in 2022, so the 'invest the difference' strategy only works if you can stay invested through downturns. If a market drop would make you sell, prepaying the mortgage is the better behavioral choice. Confidence in this framework is high; confidence in any specific future return comparison is moderate, because future stock returns and interest rates are uncertain.

◈GPT-OSS 120B· Answer C

In most cases you should invest the extra cash rather than rush to pay off a mortgage, provided your loan’s after‑tax interest cost is below about 4%–5% per year. A 30‑year, $300,000 mortgage at a 4.5% nominal rate (the current U.S. average for a 30‑year fixed loan) costs roughly 3.6% after the standard itemized‑deduction benefit for mortgage interest (assuming a 25% marginal tax bracket). Over the long run the S&P 500 has delivered an average nominal return of about 10% and an after‑inflation real return of roughly 7% (Vanguard data). After accounting for a 15% long‑term capital‑gains tax on earnings, the after‑tax expected return is still around 6% – higher than the 3.6% effective mortgage cost. Therefore, each dollar you could use to pay down the loan will likely earn a higher net return by being invested in a diversified low‑cost index fund. Exception cases where paying off the loan first makes sense: - Your mortgage rate (after tax) is above 5%–6% (e.g., a 7% fixed‑rate loan). - You have a low marginal tax bracket (<15%) so the interest deduction is minimal. - You have a very low risk tolerance, need the psychological peace of being debt‑free, or have upcoming cash‑flow constraints that make the mortgage payment a burden. - You lack an emergency fund; it’s better to keep liquid reserves than to lock money into the house. Practical recommendation: 1) Calculate your after‑tax mortgage cost: interest rate × (1‑tax rate). 2) Compare it to a realistic after‑tax expected stock‑market return (≈6% for a diversified index fund). 3) If the mortgage cost is lower, allocate extra cash to a low‑expense index fund (e.g., Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund, expense ratio 0.04%). 4) If the mortgage cost is higher, or you need the safety of reduced debt, prioritize extra principal payments. Example: With a $300,000 loan at 4.5% and a 25% tax bracket, an extra $10,000 put toward principal saves about $2,025 in interest the first year. Investing that $10,000 in the S&P 500 at a 7% after‑tax return would earn about $700 more than the interest saved. Over 20 years the cumulative advantage widens dramatically (≈$40,000 vs. ≈$25,000 saved on interest).

•DeepSeek R1· Answer D

Short answer: it depends almost entirely on your after-tax mortgage rate, your tax situation, and how much liquidity you already have. There is no universal winner, but there is a defensible rule of thumb that resolves most cases cleanly. The core math is a risk-adjusted comparison. Paying down a mortgage gives you a guaranteed, risk-free, tax-free return equal to your mortgage interest rate (reduced by any deduction you can actually claim). Investing in a diversified stock portfolio has historically returned about 10 percent nominal and roughly 7 percent real per year over the long run (Damodaran's 1928-2023 S&P 500 data), but with ~15-18 percent annual volatility and painful multi-year drawdowns. So the honest comparison is not '7 percent stocks vs 6.5 percent mortgage.' It is 'a guaranteed 6.5 percent vs a risky 7-10 percent.' Because the mortgage return is guaranteed and stocks are not, the risk-adjusted breakeven sits below the raw stock return. In practice, a mortgage rate in the 6-7 percent range (roughly where 30-year US fixed rates have been in 2024-2025) is close to or better than a risk-adjusted stock bet for many people, while a 3-4 percent mortgage (common in 2020-2021) is a clear 'invest instead' situation. Concrete example. A $400,000, 30-year fixed mortgage at 6.5 percent costs $2,528 per month in principal and interest and roughly $510,000 in total interest. Put a spare $500 per month against the principal and you pay it off about 9-10 years early and save well over $200,000 in interest. Invest that same $500 per month at a 10 percent nominal return instead and it grows to roughly $1.13 million in 30 years. The investment wins only if the market actually delivers near its historical average, which it does not do on any reliable schedule. Key variables that flip the answer: - After-tax mortgage rate. Mortgage interest in the US is only deductible if you itemize and only on debt up to $750,000. After the 2017 tax law raised the standard deduction ($29,200 married / $14,600 single for 2024), most households take the standard deduction and get zero tax benefit, so their effective mortgage rate equals the nominal rate. If you do itemize at a 24 percent marginal rate, a 6.5 percent mortgage becomes roughly 4.9 percent effective, which strengthens the case for investing. - Tax-advantaged space. Never skip an employer 401(k) match or an HSA to prepay a mortgage. That is free or triple-tax-advantaged money. Maxing a Roth IRA or 401(k) is usually the better use of a marginal dollar regardless of mortgage rate. - Liquidity. Prepaying locks cash in home equity that is expensive to extract (HELOCs, cash-out refis). Investing keeps it liquid. This matters a lot if your job or income is unstable. - Time horizon and psychology. The guaranteed payoff is a certain, sleep-well return; stocks are a long-horizon, high-variance bet. Some people overinvest because they lack discipline; a mortgage payoff is forced saving. Decision rule I would actually use: - Mortgage rate below about 4-5 percent after tax: invest the extra money, keep the cheap leverage. - Mortgage rate above about 6-7 percent after tax: lean toward prepaying, because the guaranteed return is competitive with a risk-adjusted stock return. - Between those: split the difference, or prioritize whichever gives you more peace of mind and better liquidity. - First, always: emergency fund of 6-12 months, full employer match, HSA if eligible, and high-interest debt above your mortgage rate. My recommendation for a typical 2024-2025 US borrower with a 6.5-7 percent mortgage and no liquidity problem is to split the extra cash - for example, 60-70 percent into tax-advantaged index investing and 30-40 percent into mortgage principal - or to prepay if the guaranteed 6.5 percent feels better than a volatile market. For someone holding a 3 percent mortgage, investing clearly wins. The one thing I would not do is prepay the mortgage while carrying credit card debt or leaving free 401(k) match on the table.

✦Gemini Flash· Answer E

Deciding whether to pay off your mortgage early or invest the extra cash depends primarily on your mortgage interest rate, your risk tolerance, and your tax situation. From a pure mathematical standpoint, investing in broad-market index funds generally beats paying off a low-interest mortgage over long time horizons, but higher interest rates shift the balance toward paying down debt. Key comparison factors: - The expected return: The long-term nominal annualized return of the S&P 500 is approximately 10 percent (or roughly 7 percent after inflation). Paying off a mortgage offers a guaranteed return equal to your mortgage interest rate. If your mortgage rate is 3 percent, paying it off gives you a guaranteed 3 percent return. If your rate is 7 percent, paying it off yields an effective 7 percent risk-free return. - Taxes: Mortgage interest may be tax-deductible if you itemize deductions, effectively lowering the cost of your debt. Conversely, investment returns in a taxable brokerage account face capital gains and dividend taxes, though retirement accounts like a 401(k) or Roth IRA offer tax deferral or tax-free growth. - Liquidity and risk: Extra principal payments are locked into your home equity and are difficult to access without refinancing or selling. Stock market investments held in brokerage or retirement accounts are generally more liquid, though volatile in the short term. - Psychological value: Eliminating debt provides guaranteed peace of mind and reduces monthly fixed expenses, which is a major emotional and cash-flow benefit for risk-averse individuals. Decision framework by mortgage interest rate: - Below 4 percent: Invest. If you locked in a 2.5 to 3.5 percent fixed rate (common during 2020 to 2021), do not prepay the mortgage. Even risk-free cash equivalents like US Treasury bills and high-yield savings accounts currently yield between 4.5 and 5.2 percent, easily outpacing your debt cost. - Between 4 percent and 6 percent: Blend both options. This is a middle zone. You can achieve strong wealth accumulation by prioritizing investing in equities, but directing a modest percentage of surplus cash toward principal provides a balanced hedge. - Above 6.5 percent: Prepay the mortgage. A guaranteed, risk-free return of 6.5 to 7.5 percent is difficult to beat on a risk-adjusted basis in the stock market. Paying down high-rate debt should take priority over taxable stock investing. Recommended order of operations before choosing either path: - Secure any employer match on your 401(k), which offers an immediate 50 to 100 percent return. - Pay off high-interest debt, such as credit cards and personal loans. - Build a three-to-six-month liquid emergency fund. - Maximize tax-advantaged accounts (Roth IRA, HSA, remaining 401(k) limit) before putting extra capital toward a low-rate mortgage or a taxable brokerage account.

Which answer was best?

Read the answers, then pick the one you'd trust most. Human votes feed the public leaderboard.

🗺 Agreement map

How each model (rows) scored every other model's answer (columns), 0–100. Similar colours down a column mean the panel agrees about that answer; an outlier cell is a dissent.

Reviewer ↓ / Answer →A
Gemini Flash
B
DeepSeek V3
C
GPT-OSS 120B
D
DeepSeek R1
E
Gemini Flash
A Gemini Flash—93619795
B DeepSeek V385—699382
C GPT-OSS 120B7985—9382
D DeepSeek R1819336—86
E Gemini Flash90966197—
Panel agreement91%91%73%96%88%

Biggest dissents

  • DeepSeek R1 rated Answer C (GPT-OSS 120B) 36, while the rest of the panel gave it 64 (-28).
    “Contains major arithmetic and framing errors. The claim that 4.5% is the current U.S. average 30-year fixed mortgage rate is outdated or false for 2024-2025. The after-tax mortgage cost is computed incorrectly: 4.5% x (1…”
Model metrics

Response time is each model's own answer latency; accuracy, completeness, reasoning and risk (0–100) are the average scores its answer received from the other members' blind peer review.

RankModelResponse timeAccuracyCompletenessReasoningRisk↓ConsensusComposite
🏆 1DeepSeek R115.7s979697896%96
2DeepSeek V37.7s9391921191%92
3Gemini Flash7.3s8782831988%84
4Gemini Flash4.8s8683832591%83
5GPT-OSS 120B7.2s5868565573%58

Got a question of your own?

Several AI models answer it independently, review each other blind, and a chairman writes one verdict. Free.

Convene a council →

See which AI models win most often →