Shared council · 8 Oct 2026 · What is Council AI?
Is learning to code still worth it for beginners in the age of AI?
analysis · 5-model panel · balanced debate · rigorous chair
⚖ Chairman's verdict
Yes, learning to code is still worth it for most beginners in 2025, but only if you change what you learn and why. The old path of memorising syntax to become a junior code monkey is largely dead; the new path is to become someone who can specify, verify, debug, and integrate software, using AI as a tool rather than an oracle. If your goal is to build products, automate work, analyse data, or work in a tech-adjacent role, coding remains one of the highest-leverage skills you can learn. If your only goal is a guaranteed middle-class salary with no real interest in building things, the odds are worse than they were in 2019. The evidence cuts both ways. On the positive side, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics projects roughly 17 percent growth for software developers, QA analysts, and testers from 2023 to 2033, with about 153,900 openings per year and a median pay of $132,270 as of May 2023. AI is already inside the job: Stack Overflow's 2024 Developer Survey found 62 percent of developers use AI tools, up from 44 percent in 2023. A 2023 GitHub Copilot study by Peng and colleagues found developers completed a task 55.8 percent faster with Copilot, though that was a controlled task and may not generalise to all software work. On the negative side, the entry-level market has cooled hard. Layoffs.fyi tracked 262,682 tech layoffs in 2023 and 152,922 in 2024, and while that data does not break down by seniority, the roles that used to train juniors, such as simple CRUD endpoints, basic UI, and boilerplate tests, are exactly what AI does well. Sundar Pichai said in October 2024 that more than 25 percent of new code at Google is AI-generated. The bar for what a beginner must demonstrate has clearly risen. What still matters, and what you should actually learn: - Learn one language deeply enough to build and debug. Python is the best default if you care about data, AI, automation, or backend work. JavaScript and TypeScript are the standard if you care about web and full-stack. Do not spend months on a single framework before you can build and debug a small end-to-end application. - Prioritise reading and reviewing code over rote memorisation. AI produces plausible but wrong code, including hallucinated APIs, subtle logic bugs, and security flaws. You cannot catch those if you cannot read code. - Focus on the unglamorous fundamentals: data structures, control flow, HTTP and REST, SQL and database design, Git, automated testing, debugging, and basic cloud deployment. These are what let you fix AI mistakes and work on a team. - Learn the AI layer: prompt engineering, API calls to OpenAI or Anthropic, retrieval-augmented generation, vector databases, evaluation, and guardrails. You do not need a PhD, but you should be able to ship a working LLM feature. - Add domain knowledge. Coding plus healthcare, finance, law, or logistics is far more valuable than coding alone. - Build 3 to 5 portfolio projects that solve a real problem for a real user. Examples: a scheduling tool for a local clinic, a scraping plus dashboard app for a niche market, or a small AI-powered assistant for a specific workflow. - Treat AI as a tutor and pair programmer, not an autopilot. Ask it to explain, generate tests, and review your code, but understand every line before you deploy it. Concrete curriculum options that reviewers flagged as credible: Harvard CS50x (free), freeCodeCamp's Responsive Web Design and JavaScript Algorithms and Data Structures, The Odin Project's Full Stack JavaScript, Full Stack Open from the University of Helsinki, and Coursera's Google IT Automation with Python. Aim for 6 to 12 months of consistent part-time study to become job-ready for a junior role, and expect to apply for 100 or more jobs in this market. Do not pay $15,000 for a bootcamp until you have completed a free curriculum for 4 to 6 weeks and still want it. One important correction: some answers cited a 22 percent growth projection for 2021 to 2031 and a claim that 68 percent of non-technical job ads list coding as a preferred skill. The 22 percent figure is outdated, and the 68 percent statistic could not be verified. Ignore both. The current BLS figure to use is the 17 percent projection for 2023 to 2033, and even that was flagged as unclear in live fact-checking, so treat it as a reasonable but not ironclad number. Bottom line: pure rote coders are at high risk of obsolescence, but people who understand logic, architecture, testing, and AI-assisted workflows are more productive and more employable than ever. The safest bet is not learn to code alone; it is learn to build with code and AI.
Key reasoning
The strongest answers (D, B, A) converge on the same core claim: coding remains valuable, but the value has shifted from syntax production to specification, verification, debugging, and system design. This is supported by the BLS 17 percent growth projection for 2023 to 2033, the Peng et al. 2023 Copilot study showing 55.8 percent faster task completion, Stack Overflow's 2024 finding that 62 percent of developers use AI tools, and Sundar Pichai's October 2024 statement that over 25 percent of new code at Google is AI-generated. The counter-evidence is the cooled entry-level market: Layoffs.fyi tracked 262,682 tech layoffs in 2023 and 152,922 in 2024, and AI compresses exactly the junior tasks that used to be training grounds. Answer C was penalised heavily for outdated BLS data (22 percent for 2021 to 2031) and an unverifiable 68 percent job-ad statistic, so those claims were dropped. Answer E's 2x to 5x productivity claim was unsupported and softened. The synthesis is that beginners should learn Python or TypeScript deeply, focus on fundamentals and AI orchestration, build real portfolio projects, and treat AI as a tutor rather than an oracle.
Points of agreement
- Coding remains worth learning for most beginners, but the goalposts have shifted from syntax memorisation to specification, verification, debugging, and system design.
- AI tools hallucinate, introduce security flaws, and produce plausible but wrong code, so the ability to read and audit code is more important, not less.
- Python is the best default first language for data, AI, automation, and backend work; JavaScript and TypeScript are the standard for web and full-stack.
- Core fundamentals still matter: data structures, HTTP and APIs, SQL, Git, testing, debugging, and basic cloud deployment.
- Beginners should build 3 to 5 real portfolio projects and learn to orchestrate AI tools rather than rely on them as an oracle.
- The entry-level job market has cooled significantly, with over 260,000 tech layoffs in 2023 and roughly 150,000 in 2024, making the junior path harder than in 2019 to 2021.
Disagreements & tradeoffs
- Answer C cited a 22 percent BLS growth projection for 2021 to 2031 and a 68 percent job-ad statistic; both were flagged as outdated or unverifiable and were dropped.
- Answer E claimed 2x to 5x productivity gains from AI; this was unsupported and softened to the more defensible 55.8 percent figure from the Peng et al. Copilot study.
- Answer B inferred that layoffs disproportionately affected junior roles; Layoffs.fyi does not break down by seniority, so that inference was softened.
- The 17 percent BLS projection for 2023 to 2033 was flagged as unclear in live fact-checking, so it is presented as a reasonable but not ironclad number.
- Reviewers disagreed on how much emphasis to place on soft skills and networking versus technical fundamentals; both matter, but the technical case is better evidenced.
🔎 Fact check (live web search)
Specific claims from the answers, checked against current web sources before the Chairman wrote the verdict.
- ? UnclearAccording to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment for software developers, QA analysts, and testers is projected to grow by 17 percent from 2023 to 2033.
While one result mentions a 17% increase from 2023 to 2033 for QA analyst career paths, the provided search results do not confirm that the US Bureau of Labor Statistics projected a 17 percent growth for the combined group of software developers, QA analysts, and testers.
- ✓ SupportedLayoffs.fyi tracked over 260,000 tech layoffs in 2023 and roughly 150,000 in 2024.
Per data tracked by Layoffs.fyi, there were 262,682 tech layoffs in 2023 (over 260,000) and 152,922 in 2024 (roughly 150,000).
- ✓ SupportedSundar Pichai stated in October 2024 that more than 25 percent of new code at Google is AI-generated.
Reports from October 2024 confirm that CEO Sundar Pichai stated that over 25 percent of new code at Google was generated by AI.
- ? UnclearNon-technical roles now list basic coding or scripting as a preferred skill in 68% of job ads according to LinkedIn Emerging Jobs 2023.
None of the provided sources mention the LinkedIn Emerging Jobs 2023 report or the statistic that 68% of non-technical roles list basic coding or scripting as a preferred skill.
Risk & uncertainty
- The 17 percent BLS growth projection for software developers, QA analysts, and testers from 2023 to 2033 was flagged as unclear in live fact-checking; treat it as a reasonable estimate rather than a confirmed figure.
- The Peng et al. 55.8 percent productivity gain comes from a controlled task and may not generalise to all software development.
- Layoffs.fyi data does not break down layoffs by seniority, so the claim that juniors were disproportionately affected is an inference, not a directly supported fact.
- AI tooling and hiring markets are evolving quickly; the premium on human verification and system design could rise further if AI agents automate mid-level tasks faster than expected.
- The 68 percent job-ad statistic and the 22 percent BLS projection from 2021 to 2031 are outdated or unverifiable and should not be used.
- Salary and growth figures are US-centric and may not apply to other labour markets.
- Consensus among models is not proof; they can share blind spots.
Suggested next steps
- Pick one language and commit for at least 6 months: Python for data, AI, automation, or backend; TypeScript and JavaScript for web and full-stack.
- Complete a free structured curriculum such as Harvard CS50x, freeCodeCamp, The Odin Project, Full Stack Open, or Coursera's Google IT Automation with Python before paying for any bootcamp.
- Build 3 to 5 portfolio projects that solve a real problem for a real user, and deploy them publicly so employers can see working software.
- Learn the AI layer: prompt engineering, API calls to OpenAI or Anthropic, retrieval-augmented generation, vector databases, evaluation, and guardrails.
- Practise reading and debugging AI-generated code deliberately; ask AI to explain, generate tests, and review, but verify every line before deploying.
- Add a domain specialisation such as healthcare, finance, law, or logistics to differentiate yourself from generic junior developers.
- Expect a 6 to 12 month part-time runway to junior job-readiness and plan to apply for 100 or more roles in the current market.
- Reassess after 4 to 6 weeks of free study: if you still want it, continue; if not, you have saved yourself a large bootcamp fee.
Model scorecard
Each model's answer (5)
Yes, learning to code is still worth it, but the nature of what you learn and why you learn it has fundamentally shifted. Beginners are no longer training to be syntax translators who manually write boilerplate code; they are training to be software designers, reviewers, and systems integrators who direct AI tools. Why coding remains essential: - Verification and debugging: Generative models such as OpenAI GPT-4o, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and GitHub Copilot regularly hallucinate logic errors, invent non-existent APIs, and introduce subtle security vulnerabilities. You cannot reliably evaluate or debug code if you do not understand the underlying fundamentals. - System architecture and integration: AI excels at isolated snippets and small modules, but human developers must structure overall systems, define data models, manage latency and state, and connect disparate services like AWS, PostgreSQL, and Stripe. - Economic demand: According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment for software developers, quality assurance analysts, and testers is projected to grow by approximately 17 percent from 2023 to 2033, well above the average for all occupations. The demand is not disappearing; it is concentrating on engineers who can deliver faster using AI. - AI as an amplifier: A 2023 study by GitHub, Microsoft, and MIT researchers (Peng et al.) found that developers using GitHub Copilot completed coding tasks 55.8 percent faster. However, this productivity boost accrues to people who understand how to structure prompts, review output, and write tests, not to people who cannot code at all. How beginners should adapt their roadmap today: - Choose high-leverage languages: Start with Python for general programming and AI workflows, or TypeScript/JavaScript for web application development. - Prioritize reading and reviewing code over rote memorization: Spend time reading open-source code, understanding control flow, and spotting edge cases rather than memorizing syntax rules that an LLM can autocomplete. - Focus on core computer science fundamentals: Learn data structures, networking basics (HTTP, REST, websockets), database design (SQL), and automated testing. These foundations remain unchanged regardless of the generation tool used. - Treat AI as a personal tutor, not an autopilot: Use AI to explain unfamiliar concepts, generate practice problems, and identify syntax errors, but ensure you understand every line before deploying it.
Yes, learning to code is still worth it for most beginners, but the goalposts have shifted. The value is no longer in memorizing syntax or writing boilerplate—AI handles that well. Instead, the value is in being able to specify, verify, and integrate code into real systems. If you want to build software, automate tasks, analyse data, or work closely with technical teams, coding remains a high-leverage skill. If your only goal is to produce simple scripts or web pages, AI can already do much of that for you, so the marginal return is lower. Concrete evidence: The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects 17% growth for software developers from 2023 to 2033, much faster than the average, adding about 327,900 jobs (BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2024). That is not a dying field. At the same time, entry-level hiring has cooled. Layoffs.fyi tracked over 260,000 tech layoffs in 2023 and roughly 150,000 in 2024, disproportionately affecting junior roles. AI coding assistants like GitHub Copilot and Cursor now write a substantial share of code in some teams—Google CEO Sundar Pichai said in October 2024 that more than 25% of new code at Google is AI-generated. So the bar for what a beginner must demonstrate has risen. What still matters: (1) Debugging and reading code—AI produces plausible but wrong code; someone must catch errors. (2) System design and data modeling—deciding how pieces fit together. (3) Domain knowledge—coding plus healthcare, finance, law, or logistics is far more valuable than coding alone. (4) Prompt engineering and AI orchestration—knowing how to break a problem into steps an AI can execute and then test the result. What matters less: memorizing syntax, writing CRUD apps from scratch, or learning a framework just because it is popular. Those tasks are increasingly automated. Recommendation for a beginner in 2025: learn Python or JavaScript, but focus on projects that require you to integrate AI tools, debug failures, and deploy something real. Spend at least as much time on problem decomposition and testing as on syntax. If you are choosing a first language, Python remains the best default because of its dominance in AI, data, and scripting (TIOBE Index, 2025). If you want web front-ends, JavaScript/TypeScript is still the standard. Avoid spending months on a single framework before you can build and debug a small end-to-end application. Confidence: I am highly confident that coding skills retain economic value (90%). I am moderately confident that the specific entry-level path is harder than it was in 2019–2021 (75%), because hiring data is noisy and AI tooling is still evolving. The biggest uncertainty is how quickly AI agents will automate mid-level tasks; if that happens faster than expected, the premium on human verification and system design will rise further, not disappear.
Yes – learning to code remains a solid investment for beginners, but the most valuable strategy is to learn core programming concepts and how to work alongside AI‑assisted tools rather than trying to memorize every syntax detail. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a 22 % growth (about 480,000 new jobs) for software developers between 2021‑2031, with median pay of $120,730 per year (2022 data). Even roles that are traditionally “non‑technical” (product management, data analysis, digital marketing) now list basic coding or scripting as a preferred skill in 68 % of job ads (LinkedIn Emerging Jobs 2023). At the same time, AI code‑assistants like GitHub Copilot, OpenAI Codex and Google Gemini can automate up to 30‑40 % of routine boilerplate, but they still require a human who can define problems, review generated code, and understand algorithmic trade‑offs. Therefore, beginners should focus on: - mastering programming fundamentals (variables, control flow, data structures, algorithms) using a versatile language such as Python or JavaScript; - learning version control (Git) and collaborative workflows; - gaining proficiency in prompting and reviewing AI‑generated code; - building a portfolio of small end‑to‑end projects that demonstrate problem‑solving, not just language syntax. If a learner’s goal is purely to automate personal tasks, a basic scripting skill combined with AI tools may be sufficient. If the goal is a long‑term career in technology, investing 6‑12 months in a structured curriculum (e.g., Coursera’s “Google IT Automation with Python” or freeCodeCamp’s full‑stack certification) and then leveraging AI to accelerate development will yield the highest ROI. In short, coding is still worth learning, but the curriculum should be AI‑aware and outcome‑focused.
Short answer: Yes for most beginners, but only if you change what you are learning and why. Learning to code is still worth it as a path to building software, automating work, and working with AI systems. It is not worth it as a generic 12-week bootcamp-to-junior-job ticket with no portfolio, no domain knowledge, and no AI fluency. The routine coding tasks that used to train juniors are now often done by AI, so the entry bar is higher. But the demand for people who can design, debug, test, and integrate systems is still strong. The devil's advocate view is that the golden age of learn to code as a guaranteed middle-class job is over. That is partly true. But the conclusion that coding is no longer worth learning does not follow. Here is the evidence on both sides. Why the optimists are right: - Demand for software work is still projected to grow. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects employment for software developers, quality assurance analysts, and testers to grow 17 percent from 2023 to 2033, much faster than average, with about 153,900 openings per year. Median pay was $132,270 in May 2023. That is not a dying field. - AI is already inside the job. Stack Overflow's 2024 Developer Survey found 62 percent of developers currently use AI tools, up from 44 percent in 2023. Beginners who can direct, review, and fix AI output are more employable, not less. - Productivity gains are real. A 2023 GitHub Copilot study by Peng and colleagues found developers completed a task 55.8 percent faster with Copilot. That means one developer can do more, which raises the value of judgment, architecture, testing, and domain knowledge. Why the pessimists are right: - AI compresses the bottom rung. The tasks that used to train juniors, like writing simple CRUD endpoints, basic UI, and boilerplate tests, are exactly what AI does well. Entry-level roles are more competitive. - The job market has cooled from the 2021 peak. Tech layoffs totaled over 260,000 in 2023 and about 150,000 in 2024, according to Layoffs.fyi. A bootcamp certificate alone is no longer a ticket. - AI output is often wrong or insecure. If you cannot read code, you cannot tell when the model is hallucinating an API, introducing a bug, or leaking data. That is why coding fundamentals matter more, not less. What a beginner should actually do: - Learn one language deeply enough to build and debug: Python if you care about data, AI, automation, or backend; JavaScript and TypeScript if you care about web and full-stack. - Use a real curriculum, not random videos: Harvard CS50x (free), freeCodeCamp's Responsive Web Design and JavaScript Algorithms and Data Structures, The Odin Project's Full Stack JavaScript, or Full Stack Open from the University of Helsinki. - Build 3 to 5 portfolio projects that solve a real problem for a real user. Examples: a scheduling tool for a local clinic, a scraping plus dashboard app for a niche market, or a small AI-powered assistant for a specific workflow. - Learn the AI layer: prompt engineering, retrieval-augmented generation, API calls to OpenAI or Anthropic, vector databases, evaluation, and guardrails. You do not need a PhD, but you should be able to ship a working LLM feature. - Learn the unglamorous fundamentals: Git, SQL, HTTP and APIs, testing, debugging, data structures, and basic cloud deployment. These are what let you fix AI mistakes and work on a team. - Treat AI as a tutor and pair programmer, not an oracle. Ask it to explain, generate tests, and review your code. Verify everything. Recommendation: Yes, start. But do not pay $15,000 for a bootcamp until you have completed a free curriculum for 4 to 6 weeks and still want it. Aim for 6 to 12 months of consistent part-time study to become job-ready for a junior role, and expect to apply for 100 or more jobs in this market. If you only want a high salary with no interest in building things, the odds are worse than they were in 2019. If you want to automate your current job, build a product, or work in a tech-adjacent role, coding is one of the highest-leverage skills you can learn. The safest bet is not learn to code alone; it is learn to build with code and AI.
Yes, learning to code is still worth it, but the nature of what you must learn has fundamentally shifted. The goal is no longer memorizing syntax or writing boilerplate code from scratch; it is understanding computation, system design, logic, and how to verify software. Why learning to code remains valuable: - Code is the ultimate specification language. English and natural language are inherently ambiguous. High-level logic still requires deterministic execution, and expressing exact business rules demands code. - AI makes errors and hallucinates. AI assistants like GitHub Copilot and Claude 3.5 Sonnet generate syntactically plausible code that often contains subtle security flaws, performance bottlenecks, or logical bugs. You cannot debug or audit code you cannot read. - Leverage increases productivity. Developers who understand fundamentals use AI tools to achieve 2x to 5x higher output. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics still projects software development employment to grow by 17 percent between 2023 and 2033, well above average for all occupations. - The barrier to building products is lower. A beginner who understands programming fundamentals can now build full-stack prototypes in days rather than months by orchestrating AI-generated components. What beginners should do differently today: - Do not spend months memorizing obscure syntax or trivia. Focus on core concepts: data structures, control flow, API integration, and architectural patterns. - Learn a versatile language with strong ecosystem support. Python remains the gold standard for data, machine learning, and automation, while TypeScript is ideal for full-stack web development. - Treat AI as a senior pair programmer, not an oracle. Use AI tools to explain unfamiliar concepts, generate initial drafts, and write tests, but insist on understanding every line of code before committing it. - Emphasize systems thinking, testing, and debugging. The most durable developer skills are defining clean interfaces, writing comprehensive test suites, and isolating failures in complex systems. Bottom line: Pure rote coders are at high risk of obsolescence, but software engineers who understand logic, architecture, and AI-assisted workflows are more productive and capable than ever.
Which answer was best?
Read the answers, then pick the one you'd trust most. Human votes feed the public leaderboard.
🗺 Agreement map
How each model (rows) scored every other model's answer (columns), 0–100. Similar colours down a column mean the panel agrees about that answer; an outlier cell is a dissent.
| Reviewer ↓ / Answer → | A Gemini Flash | B DeepSeek V3 | C GPT-OSS 120B | D DeepSeek R1 | E Gemini Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Gemini Flash | — | 92 | 80 | 96 | 89 |
| B DeepSeek V3 | 87 | — | 68 | 94 | 83 |
| C GPT-OSS 120B | · | · | — | · | · |
| D DeepSeek R1 | 94 | 89 | 58 | — | 80 |
| E Gemini Flash | 89 | 92 | 77 | 95 | — |
| Panel agreement | 94% | 97% | 81% | 98% | 92% |
Biggest dissents
- DeepSeek R1 rated Answer C (GPT-OSS 120B) 58, while the rest of the panel gave it 75 (-17).“Contains incorrect BLS projections (22% growth and 480,000 jobs for 2021–2031; actual BLS figure for that period was 25% growth and ~370,600 jobs, and more recent data show 17% for 2023–2033). The LinkedIn '68% of job ad…”
Model metrics
Response time is each model's own answer latency; accuracy, completeness, reasoning and risk (0–100) are the average scores its answer received from the other members' blind peer review.
| Rank | Model | Response time | Accuracy | Completeness | Reasoning | Risk↓ | Consensus | Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 1 | DeepSeek R1 | 33.0s | 97 | 97 | 96 | 8 | 98% | 96 |
| 2 | DeepSeek V3 | 7.7s | 95 | 91 | 93 | 11 | 97% | 93 |
| 3 | Gemini Flash | 10.4s | 93 | 90 | 92 | 13 | 94% | 91 |
| 4 | Gemini Flash | 12.1s | 85 | 83 | 85 | 28 | 92% | 83 |
| 5 | GPT-OSS 120B | 29.2s | 72 | 79 | 74 | 44 | 81% | 72 |
Got a question of your own?
Several AI models answer it independently, review each other blind, and a chairman writes one verdict. Free.
Convene a council →Previous Daily Councils
- 2026-10-07Is buying a hybrid currently a smarter choice than a fully electric vehicle for most drivers?
- 2026-10-06Does switching jobs every two to three years still beat company loyalty for long-term career growth?
- 2026-10-05Should you allow AI agents to autonomously send messages and make bookings on your behalf?
- 2026-10-04Is living in an expensive major city still worth it for early-career professionals?
- 2026-10-03Should you pay off your mortgage early or invest extra money in the stock market instead?
- 2026-10-02Should job seekers disclose when they use AI to write their resumes and cover letters?
- 2026-10-01Is paying a premium for an elite university degree still worth the investment?
- 2026-09-30Can tech companies realistically be trusted to self-regulate their own AI safety?